Brandinium

Trademark search for:

ROYAL AIR FORCE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2006-11-15 — Application filed
  • 2006-11-21 — Application filed
  • 2006-11-22 — Notice of design search code mailed
  • 2007-03-19 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2007-03-22 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-03-23 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2007-10-22 — Application abandoned
  • 2007-10-22 — Application abandoned
  • 2007-12-27 — Paper received
  • 2007-12-27 — Petition to revive-received
  • 2008-01-10 — Assigned to petition staff
  • 2008-01-19 — Office action issued
  • 2008-02-01 — Assigned to lie
  • 2008-02-02 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2008-02-02 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-02-04 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-02-04 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-08-01 — Paper received
  • 2008-08-02 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2008-08-02 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-08-06 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-08-07 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-11-23 — Office action issued
  • 2008-11-23 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-11-24 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2008-12-05 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2008-12-15 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2008-12-29 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
  • 2009-01-07 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2009-01-07 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-01-07 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2009-01-07 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2009-01-08 — Examiners amendment mailed
  • 2009-01-12 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2009-01-23 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
  • 2009-02-10 — Priority action written
  • 2009-02-10 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2009-02-11 — Priority action mailed
  • 2009-08-10 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-08-10 — Office action issued
  • 2009-08-10 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-08-18 — Priority action written
  • 2009-08-19 — Priority action mailed
  • 2009-08-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2009-08-28 — Office action issued
  • 2009-08-28 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2009-09-15 — Examiners amendment mailed
  • 2009-09-15 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2009-09-22 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2009-10-05 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-10-05 — Assigned to lie
  • 2009-10-08 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2009-10-21 — Notice of publication
  • 2009-11-10 — Published for opposition
  • 2010-02-02 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2010-07-29 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2010-07-29 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2010-08-24 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2010-08-24 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2010-08-25 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
  • 2011-02-01 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2011-02-01 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2011-02-03 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2011-02-04 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
  • 2011-09-05 — Application abandoned
  • 2011-09-05 — Final status recorded
  • 2011-09-06 — Application abandoned

Owner Information

The Secretary of State for Defence in Her Britannic Majesty's Government of the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland
London GB
The Secretary of State for Defence in Her Britannic Majesty's Government of the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland
London GB

Correspondent

WILLIAM H BREWSTER KILPATRICK STOCKTON LLP
1100 PEACHTREE ST STE 2800
ATLANTA, GA 30309
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2006-11-15
Status Date:
2011-09-05
Category:
Leather Goods
Filing Year:
2006

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.