Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Leather Goods ›
2007 ›
TO ›
TOTLES
Trademark search for:
TOTLES
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-10-30 — Application filed
2007-11-02 — Application filed
2007-11-03 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2008-02-12 — Assigned to examiner
2008-02-14 — Examiners amendment -written
2008-02-14 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2008-02-14 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2008-02-14 — Assigned to lie
2008-02-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-02-15 — Examiner's amendment entered
2008-02-15 — Law office publication review completed
2008-03-05 — Notice of publication
2008-03-25 — Published for opposition
2008-06-17 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2008-06-23 — Fax received
2008-07-02 — Review of correspondence complete
2008-12-09 — Sou teas extension received
2008-12-09 — Sou extension 1 filed
2008-12-09 — Sou extension 1 granted
2009-06-04 — Sou teas extension received
2009-06-04 — Sou extension 2 filed
2009-06-29 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2009-06-29 — Sou extension 2 granted
2009-12-07 — Sou teas extension received
2009-12-07 — Sou extension 3 filed
2009-12-08 — Sou extension 3 granted
2010-01-04 — Assigned to examiner
2010-07-19 — Application abandoned
2010-07-19 — Application abandoned
2010-07-19 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Totle, Inc.
Osseo , MN
Totle, Inc.
Osseo , MN
Correspondent
Jeffrey R. Cadwell DORSEY & WHITNEY LLP 50 S 6TH ST STE 1500 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-1553
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-10-30
Status Date:
2010-07-19
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.