Brandinium

Trademark search for:

SIMPLYSHE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2008-04-01 — Application filed
  • 2008-04-04 — Application filed
  • 2008-04-05 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
  • 2008-07-10 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2008-07-16 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2008-07-16 — Assigned to lie
  • 2008-07-17 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2008-07-28 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
  • 2008-08-26 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-08-26 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-08-26 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2008-08-26 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2008-08-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2008-08-28 — Office action issued
  • 2008-08-28 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-09-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2008-09-15 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2008-09-17 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2008-09-17 — Withdrawn from pub - examining attorney request
  • 2008-10-08 — Priority action written
  • 2008-10-08 — Priority action e-mailed
  • 2008-10-08 — Notification of priority action e-mailed
  • 2008-11-03 — Office action issued
  • 2008-11-03 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2008-11-04 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2008-11-22 — Combined examiner's amendment/priority action entered
  • 2008-11-22 — Examiners amendment and/or priority action - completed
  • 2008-11-22 — Notification of examiner's amendment/priority action e-mailed
  • 2008-11-22 — Examiner's amendment/priority action e-mailed
  • 2008-12-13 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2008-12-13 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2008-12-13 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2008-12-13 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2009-01-03 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2009-01-03 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-01-03 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-01-03 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2009-01-21 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-01-21 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2009-02-02 — Withdrawn from pub - og review query
  • 2009-02-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-02-17 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
  • 2009-02-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-02-17 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2009-09-10 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2009-09-10 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-09-10 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2009-09-10 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2009-10-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2009-10-01 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2009-11-03 — Published for opposition
  • 2009-11-03 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2010-01-26 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2010-07-26 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2010-07-26 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2010-08-17 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2010-08-17 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2010-08-18 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2010-09-23 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2010-09-23 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2011-01-19 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2011-01-19 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2011-01-24 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2011-01-25 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2011-07-26 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2011-07-26 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2011-08-01 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2011-08-02 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2012-01-26 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2012-01-26 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2012-01-30 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2012-01-31 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2012-07-26 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2012-07-26 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2012-07-26 — Teas request to divide received
  • 2012-07-26 — Use amendment filed
  • 2012-07-26 — Sou extension 5 filed
  • 2012-07-26 — Divisional request received
  • 2012-08-02 — Divisional processing complete
  • 2012-08-02 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2012-08-02 — Sou extension 5 granted
  • 2012-08-03 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
  • 2012-08-03 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
  • 2012-08-14 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2012-08-20 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2012-08-21 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2012-08-27 — Teas post publication amendment received
  • 2012-09-25 — Registered-principal register
  • 2013-08-01 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2013-08-01 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2016-03-08 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2016-03-08 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2017-05-01 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2017-05-01 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2017-07-26 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2017-07-26 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2017-09-25 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2018-06-14 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2019-04-26 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2019-04-26 — Final status recorded
  • 2021-10-06 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically

Owner Information

SimplyShe, Inc.
San Francisco , CA
SimplyShe, Inc.
San Francisco , CA
SimplyShe, Inc.
San Francisco , CA

Correspondent

Marina A. Lewis Lewis Kent LLP
235 Montgomery Street, 30th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94104
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2008-04-01
Status Date:
2019-04-26
Category:
Leather Goods
Filing Year:
2008

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.