Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Leather Goods ›
2009 ›
QQ ›
Q 8
Trademark search for:
Q 8
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-11-05 — Application filed
2009-11-09 — Application filed
2009-11-13 — Application filed
2009-11-14 — Notice of design search code mailed
2010-02-10 — Assigned to examiner
2010-02-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-03-06 — Assigned to lie
2010-03-06 — Law office publication review completed
2010-04-13 — Published for opposition
2010-04-13 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-06-08 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-12-07 — Sou teas extension received
2010-12-07 — Sou extension 1 filed
2010-12-07 — Sou extension 1 granted
2010-12-09 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2011-06-08 — Sou extension 2 filed
2011-07-11 — Application abandoned
2011-07-11 — Application abandoned
2011-09-03 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2011-09-03 — Petition to revive-granted
2011-09-03 — Teas petition to revive received
2011-09-06 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2011-09-06 — Sou extension 2 granted
2011-09-07 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2012-01-09 — Application abandoned
2012-01-09 — Application abandoned
2012-01-09 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
D.S.P.T. INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Los Angeles , CA
D.S.P.T. INTERNATIONAL, INC.
Los Angeles , CA
Correspondent
MAURICE B. PILOSOF MAURICE B. PILOSOF, ESQ PO BOX 691937 WEST HOLLYWOOD, CA 90069-8937 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-11-05
Status Date:
2012-01-09
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.