Trademark search for:

RUNECO

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2009-10-08 — Application filed
2009-10-12 — Application filed
2009-10-14 — Application filed
2010-01-11 — Final disposition recorded
2010-01-11 — Final disposition recorded
2010-01-11 — Assigned to examiner
2010-01-11 — Final disposition recorded
2010-04-29 — Office action issued
2010-05-21 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-05-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-05-21 — Assigned to lie
2010-05-21 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-05-24 — Law office publication review completed
2010-06-29 — Published for opposition
2010-06-29 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-08-24 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2011-02-21 — Teas statement of use received
2011-02-21 — Use amendment filed
2011-03-11 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2011-03-11 — Statement of use processing complete
2011-03-14 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2011-03-23 — Law office registration review completed
2011-03-24 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2011-04-26 — Registered-principal register
2016-04-26 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2017-12-01 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2017-12-01 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

DADA CORPORATION
Seoul KR

DADA CORPORATION
Seoul KR

DADA CORPORATION
Seoul KR

Correspondent

DADA CORPORATION DADA CORPORATION
#790-4, YEOKSAM-DONG, KANGNAM-KU
SEOUL, 135-080
KOREA, REPUBLIC OF

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2009-10-08

Status Date:
2017-12-01

Category:
Leather Goods

Filing Year:
2009

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.