Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Leather Goods ›
2009 ›
SA ›
SATTEEZ
Trademark search for:
SATTEEZ
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-02-03 — Application filed
2009-02-06 — Application filed
2009-02-06 — Application filed
2009-02-07 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2009-04-21 — Assigned to examiner
2009-04-24 — Priority action mailed
2009-04-24 — Priority action written
2009-05-26 — Office action issued
2009-05-27 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-05-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-05-27 — Assigned to lie
2009-05-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-06-02 — Law office publication review completed
2009-06-17 — Notice of publication
2009-07-07 — Published for opposition
2009-07-30 — Teas change of correspondence received
2009-09-29 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-03-29 — Sou teas extension received
2010-03-29 — Sou extension 1 filed
2010-04-20 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2010-04-20 — Sou extension 1 granted
2010-04-21 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2010-09-27 — Sou teas extension received
2010-09-27 — Sou extension 2 filed
2010-09-29 — Sou extension 2 granted
2010-09-30 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2011-05-02 — Application abandoned
2011-05-02 — Application abandoned
2011-05-02 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Covrigaru, Dolores
Albertson , NY
Covrigaru, Delores
Albertson , NY
Correspondent
Stephen R. Barrese Dilworth & Barrese, LLP 1000 Woodbury Road, Suite 405 Woodbury, NY 11797 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-02-03
Status Date:
2011-05-02
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.