Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Leather Goods ›
2010 ›
IN ›
INTIMATE SOUL
Trademark search for:
INTIMATE SOUL
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2010-03-03 — Application filed
2010-03-06 — Application filed
2010-03-09 — Application filed
2010-06-05 — Assigned to examiner
2010-06-11 — Priority action written
2010-06-11 — Priority action e-mailed
2010-06-11 — Notification of priority action e-mailed
2010-07-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-07-01 — Office action issued
2010-07-01 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-07-17 — Examiners amendment -written
2010-07-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
2010-07-17 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2010-07-17 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2010-07-17 — Examiner's amendment entered
2010-07-31 — Assigned to lie
2010-07-31 — Law office publication review completed
2010-09-07 — Published for opposition
2010-09-07 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2010-10-06 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2010-11-02 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2011-06-06 — Application abandoned
2011-06-06 — Application abandoned
2011-06-06 — Final status recorded
2012-06-15 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2012-06-15 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
Owner Information
Intimate Soul, LLC
Austell , GA
Intimate Soul, LLC
Austell , GA
Correspondent
Mathew L. Grell Balser & Grell IP Law 4307 Jones Bridge Circle Norcross, GA 30092 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2010-03-03
Status Date:
2011-06-06
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.