Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Leather Goods ›
2010 ›
SC ›
SCRATCH GOLF
Trademark search for:
SCRATCH GOLF
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2010-02-03 — Application filed
2010-02-06 — Application filed
2010-02-11 — Application filed
2010-05-03 — Final disposition recorded
2010-05-03 — Final disposition recorded
2010-05-03 — Assigned to examiner
2010-05-03 — Final disposition recorded
2010-11-05 — Office action issued
2010-11-05 — Petition to revive-granted
2010-11-05 — Teas petition to revive received
2010-11-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-11-19 — Assigned to lie
2010-11-19 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-12-09 — Suspension letter written
2010-12-09 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2010-12-09 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2011-06-09 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2011-12-15 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2012-06-18 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2012-12-19 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2013-07-01 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2013-07-19 — Final disposition recorded
2013-07-19 — Final disposition recorded
2013-07-19 — Final disposition recorded
2014-02-14 — Application abandoned
2014-02-14 — Application abandoned
2014-02-14 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
DALLAS, STEPHEN
London GB
Correspondent
DALLAS, STEPHEN SCRATCH SPORTSWEAR U.S.A. 28 GORDON MANSIONS TORRINGTON PLACE LONDON, WC1E7HF
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2010-02-03
Status Date:
2014-02-14
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.