Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Leather Goods ›
2014 ›
CL ›
CLYMOSE LONDON
Trademark search for:
CLYMOSE LONDON
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2014-07-21 — Application filed
2014-11-27 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2014-12-01 — Application filed
2014-12-01 — Assigned to examiner
2014-12-05 — Application filed
2014-12-06 — Final disposition recorded
2014-12-07 — Office action issued
2014-12-08 — Office action issued
2014-12-08 — Office action issued
2014-12-27 — Office action issued
2015-06-04 — Teas change of correspondence received
2015-06-04 — Office action issued
2015-06-04 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-06-04 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-06-25 — Final disposition recorded
2015-06-25 — Final disposition recorded
2015-06-25 — Final disposition recorded
2015-09-24 — New representative at ib received
2016-02-08 — Application abandoned
2016-02-08 — Application abandoned
2016-04-27 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2016-04-27 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
2016-07-01 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
2017-02-08 — Final disposition recorded
2017-02-08 — Final disposition recorded
2017-02-24 — Final disposition recorded
2024-07-21 — Final status recorded
2025-02-14 — Death of international registration
2025-02-14 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg e-mailed
Correspondent
Joly Charles-Antoine @MARK 16, rue Milton Paris, 75009 FRANCE
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2014-07-21
Status Date:
2024-07-21
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.