Trademark search for:

HYPERBOLIX

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2014-12-04 — Application filed
2014-12-08 — Application filed
2014-12-11 — Application filed
2014-12-12 — Notice of pseudo mark e-mailed
2015-03-19 — Assigned to examiner
2015-03-20 — Final disposition recorded
2015-03-20 — Final disposition recorded
2015-03-20 — Final disposition recorded
2015-08-05 — Office action issued
2015-08-05 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-08-06 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-08-11 — Approved for pub - principal register
2015-08-28 — Assigned to lie
2015-08-28 — Law office publication review completed
2015-09-16 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2015-10-06 — Published for opposition
2015-10-06 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2015-12-01 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2016-05-30 — Teas delete 1(b) basis received
2016-05-30 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2016-06-25 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2016-06-30 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
2016-08-02 — Registered-principal register
2021-08-02 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2023-02-17 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2023-02-17 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Etablissements Michel Vaillant
Cluses FR

Etablissements Michel Vaillant
Cluses FR

Etablissements Michel Vaillant
Cluses FR

Correspondent

WILLIAM H. EILBERG William H Eilberg Esq
316 California Ave # 785
Reno, NV 89509-1650
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2014-12-04

Status Date:
2023-02-17

Category:
Leather Goods

Filing Year:
2014

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.