Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Legal & Security Services ›
2005 ›
RA ›
RAINBOW-WORKS LIGHTING UP THE TRUE ESSENCE
Trademark search for:
RAINBOW-WORKS LIGHTING UP THE TRUE ESSENCE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2005-07-09 — Application filed
2005-07-13 — Application filed
2006-01-30 — Assigned to examiner
2006-02-06 — Final disposition recorded
2006-02-06 — Final disposition recorded
2006-02-08 — Teas change of correspondence received
2006-02-18 — Teas change of correspondence received
2006-02-22 — Teas change of correspondence received
2006-02-27 — Paper received
2006-02-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-03-08 — Amendment from applicant entered
2006-04-07 — Final disposition recorded
2006-04-07 — Final disposition recorded
2006-10-06 — Office action issued
2006-11-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2006-11-21 — Assigned to lie
2006-11-21 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-12-06 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2006-12-06 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2006-12-12 — Final disposition recorded
2006-12-12 — Final disposition recorded
2006-12-14 — Teas change of owner address received
2006-12-14 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2006-12-19 — Office action issued
2006-12-20 — Amendment from applicant entered
2006-12-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-01-03 — Final disposition recorded
2007-01-03 — Final disposition recorded
2007-01-04 — Teas change of correspondence received
2007-01-04 — Teas change of correspondence received
2007-08-03 — Application abandoned
2007-08-03 — Application abandoned
2007-09-07 — Office action issued
2007-09-07 — Petition to revive-granted
2007-09-07 — Teas petition to revive received
2007-09-25 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-09-25 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-10-02 — Data modification completed
2007-10-09 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-10-22 — Law office publication review completed
2007-11-07 — Notice of publication
2007-11-12 — Teas change of owner address received
2007-11-12 — Teas change of owner address received
2007-11-12 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2007-11-12 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2007-11-27 — Published for opposition
2008-02-12 — Registered-principal register
2008-11-03 — Teas section 7 request received
2008-11-19 — Assigned to paralegal
2008-12-02 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 7
2009-05-04 — Paper received
2009-05-04 — Request to cancel inadvertently issued registration received
2009-05-07 — Assigned to petition staff
2009-05-29 — Reg. cancelled - restored to pendency
2009-07-09 — Attorney review/decision on amendment required
2009-07-30 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2009-08-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-08-12 — Law office publication review completed
2009-08-26 — Notice of publication
2009-09-15 — Published for opposition
2009-11-17 — Teas change of correspondence received
2009-12-01 — Registered-principal register
2012-10-21 — Teas change of correspondence received
2013-04-15 — Teas change of owner address received
2013-04-15 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2015-09-25 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-07-08 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2016-07-08 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Chiu, Irine
Wayland , MA
Chiu, Irine
Bedford , MA
Chiu, Irine
Bedford , MA
Correspondent
Cheryl L. Hodgson HODGSON LEGAL 401 Wilshire Blvd 12 Floor Penthouse SANTA MONICA, CA 90401 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2005-07-09
Status Date:
2016-07-08
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.