Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Legal & Security Services ›
2006 ›
LA ›
LARGEFRIENDS.COM
Trademark search for:
LARGEFRIENDS.COM
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-05-04 — Application filed
2006-05-10 — Application filed
2006-05-11 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2006-10-05 — Assigned to examiner
2006-10-10 — Final disposition recorded
2006-10-10 — Final disposition recorded
2007-03-27 — Office action issued
2007-04-26 — Assigned to lie
2007-04-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-04-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-05-01 — Examiners amendment -written
2007-05-01 — Approved for registration supplemental register
2007-05-01 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2007-05-01 — Examiner's amendment entered
2007-05-01 — Law office publication review completed
2007-07-10 — Registered-supplemental register
2013-07-09 — Teas section 8 received
2013-07-24 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2013-07-24 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2013-07-24 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 - e-mailed
2016-07-10 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2016-12-02 — Teas change of correspondence received
2018-02-16 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2018-02-16 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
SUCCESSFULMATCH.COM, Inc.
Mountain View , CA
SUCCESSFULMATCH.COM, Inc.
Mountain View , CA
Correspondent
Margaret C. McHugh KILPATRICK TOWNSEND & STOCKTON LLP 1100 Peachtree Street, Suite 2800 Mailstop: IP Docketing - 22 Atlanta, GA 30309
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-05-04
Status Date:
2018-02-16
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.