Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Legal & Security Services ›
2013 ›
WH ›
WHISTLEBLOWER ADVOCATES
Trademark search for:
WHISTLEBLOWER ADVOCATES
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2013-12-13 — Application filed
2013-12-17 — Application filed
2013-12-27 — Application filed
2013-12-28 — Notice of pseudo mark e-mailed
2014-03-22 — Final disposition recorded
2014-03-22 — Final disposition recorded
2014-03-22 — Assigned to examiner
2014-03-22 — Final disposition recorded
2014-04-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2014-04-07 — Office action issued
2014-04-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-04-28 — Final disposition recorded
2014-04-28 — Final disposition recorded
2014-04-28 — Final disposition recorded
2014-10-29 — Paper received
2014-10-29 — Assigned to lie
2014-10-29 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-11-05 — Amendment to use processing complete
2014-11-05 — Use amendment filed
2014-11-05 — Amendment from applicant entered
2014-11-25 — Office action issued
2014-11-25 — Use amendment accepted
2014-11-25 — Office action issued
2014-11-25 — Office action issued
2014-11-26 — Notice of acceptance of amendment to allege use e-mailed
2015-05-29 — Paper received
2015-06-05 — Application abandoned
2015-06-05 — Application abandoned
2015-06-05 — Application abandoned
2015-06-05 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Hughes Socol Piers Resnick & Dym, Ltd.
Chicago , IL
Correspondent
MICHAEL A. HIERL HUGHES SOCOL PIERS RESNICK & DYM, LTD. 3 FIRST NATIONAL PLZ CHICAGO, IL 60602-5010 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2013-12-13
Status Date:
2015-06-05
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.