Trademark search for:

R.O.S.E. RECOGNIZING THE ONENESS OF SPIRIT IN EVERYONE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2016-06-06 — Application filed
2016-06-09 — Application filed
2016-06-13 — Application filed
2016-06-14 — Notice of design search code e-mailed
2016-09-16 — Assigned to examiner
2016-09-21 — Final disposition recorded
2016-09-21 — Final disposition recorded
2016-09-21 — Final disposition recorded
2017-02-19 — Office action issued
2017-02-19 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-02-20 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-03-08 — Examiners amendment -written
2017-03-08 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2017-03-08 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2017-03-08 — Examiner's amendment entered
2017-03-08 — Approved for pub - principal register
2017-03-29 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2017-04-18 — Published for opposition
2017-04-18 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2017-07-04 — Registered-principal register
2022-07-04 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2024-01-19 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2024-01-19 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

R.O.S.E. Recognizing the Oneness of Spirit in Everyone
Crestline , CA

R.O.S.E. Recognizing the Oneness of Spirit in Everyone
Crestline , CA

R.O.S.E. Recognizing the Oneness of Spirit in Everyone
Crestline , CA

Correspondent

MCGINNIS, KIMBERLY R.O.S.E. RECOGNIZING THE ONENESS OF SPIRIT IN EVER
P.O. BOX 3301
CRESTLINE, CA 92325
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2016-06-06

Status Date:
2024-01-19

Category:
Legal & Security Services

Filing Year:
2016

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.