Brandinium

Trademark search for:

CHELSEA HOME FASHIONS

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2002-04-10 — Application filed
  • 2002-08-06 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2002-08-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2003-02-13 — Paper received
  • 2003-02-13 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2003-03-20 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2003-10-03 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2004-02-13 — Paper received
  • 2004-02-13 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2004-03-09 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2004-08-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2004-09-15 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2005-03-28 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2005-10-28 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2005-12-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-12-14 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2006-06-13 — Office action issued
  • 2006-06-13 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2006-06-16 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2006-07-25 — Office action issued
  • 2006-07-25 — Office action issued
  • 2007-01-25 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
  • 2007-01-25 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
  • 2007-01-25 — Office action issued
  • 2007-01-25 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2007-01-25 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2007-01-25 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2007-03-05 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2007-03-26 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2007-03-26 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2007-03-26 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2007-03-26 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2007-04-16 — Assigned to lie
  • 2007-04-16 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2007-05-30 — On hold - electronic record review required
  • 2007-06-22 — Electronic record review complete
  • 2007-07-11 — Notice of publication
  • 2007-07-31 — Published for opposition
  • 2007-10-23 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2008-03-21 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2008-03-21 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2008-03-21 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2008-10-01 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2008-10-01 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2008-10-01 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2009-01-02 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2009-04-20 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2009-04-20 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2009-04-20 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2009-06-02 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2009-10-20 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
  • 2009-10-20 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
  • 2009-10-20 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2009-10-20 — Use amendment filed
  • 2009-11-06 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2009-11-06 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2009-11-10 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2009-11-18 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2009-11-19 — Law office registration review completed
  • 2009-12-22 — Registered-principal register
  • 2012-02-21 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2013-06-17 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received
  • 2013-06-17 — Withdrawal of attorney granted
  • 2016-07-29 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2016-07-29 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Place Vendome Holding Co., Inc.
Bloomfield , NJ
Place Vendome Holding Co., Inc.
Bloomfield , NJ
Place Vendome Holding Co., Inc.
Bloomfield , NJ

Correspondent

Place Vendome Holding Co., Inc.
5 Lawrence Street
Bloomfield, NJ 07003
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2002-04-10
Status Date:
2016-07-29
Category:
Lighting & Heating
Filing Year:
2002

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.