Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Lighting & Heating ›
2007 ›
AI ›
AIRTECH-107
Trademark search for:
AIRTECH-107
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-04-13 — Application filed
2007-04-18 — Application filed
2007-04-19 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2007-07-27 — Assigned to examiner
2007-07-30 — Final disposition recorded
2007-07-30 — Final disposition recorded
2007-07-30 — Final disposition recorded
2008-01-22 — Teas change of correspondence received
2008-01-22 — Office action issued
2008-02-05 — Teas change of correspondence received
2008-02-21 — Assigned to lie
2008-03-20 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-03-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-04-15 — Suspension letter written
2008-04-15 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2008-04-15 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2008-10-15 — Suspension inquiry written
2008-10-15 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2008-10-15 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2009-04-15 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2009-04-20 — Suspension letter written
2009-04-20 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2009-04-20 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2009-04-20 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-04-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-10-20 — Suspension inquiry written
2009-10-20 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2009-10-20 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2009-10-20 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2010-04-20 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2010-04-21 — Suspension letter written
2010-04-21 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2010-04-21 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2010-04-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-04-21 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-10-21 — Suspension inquiry written
2010-10-21 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2010-10-21 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2011-04-29 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2011-05-05 — Application abandoned
2011-05-05 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-05-05 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-05-27 — Office action issued
2011-05-27 — Petition to revive-granted
2011-05-27 — Teas petition to revive received
2011-06-06 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-06-06 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-06-07 — Suspension letter written
2011-06-07 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2011-06-07 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2011-10-03 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2011-10-03 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-10-03 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-10-18 — Office action issued
2011-10-18 — Office action issued
2011-10-18 — Office action issued
2012-02-21 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2012-03-06 — Approved for pub - principal register
2012-03-06 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-03-06 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-03-13 — Law office publication review completed
2012-03-28 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2012-04-17 — Published for opposition
2012-04-17 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2012-07-03 — Registered-principal register
2017-07-03 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2019-02-08 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2019-02-08 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Air Tech Equipment Ltd.
Boudreau-Quest CA
Air Tech Equipment Ltd.
Boudreau-Quest CA
Air Tech Equipment Ltd.
Boudreau-Quest CA
Correspondent
JOHN C. LAMBERTSEN KENEHAN & LAMBERTSEN, LTD. 6900 WESTCLIFF DRIVE, SUITE 104 LAS VEGAS, NV 89145 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-04-13
Status Date:
2019-02-08
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.