Brandinium

Trademark search for:

OXYMATIC

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2010-02-18 — Application filed
  • 2010-04-22 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
  • 2010-04-23 — Application filed
  • 2010-04-27 — Application filed
  • 2010-05-22 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2010-05-25 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2010-05-26 — Office action issued
  • 2010-05-26 — Office action issued
  • 2010-05-26 — Office action issued
  • 2010-07-02 — Office action issued
  • 2010-12-02 — Paper received
  • 2010-12-29 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2010-12-29 — Assigned to lie
  • 2010-12-29 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-01-07 — Office action issued
  • 2011-01-10 — Office action issued
  • 2011-08-10 — Examiners amendment mailed
  • 2011-08-10 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2011-08-10 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2011-08-10 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2011-08-17 — Law office publication review completed
  • 2011-08-31 — Notice of publication
  • 2011-08-31 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
  • 2011-08-31 — Notice of start of opposition period created, to be sent to ib
  • 2011-09-20 — Published for opposition
  • 2011-09-28 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
  • 2011-09-28 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
  • 2011-10-13 — Paper received
  • 2011-10-13 — Petition to revive-received
  • 2011-10-18 — Petition granted - response received
  • 2011-10-18 — Assigned to petition staff
  • 2011-10-21 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2011-10-21 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2011-11-09 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2011-11-10 — Assigned to lie
  • 2011-11-23 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
  • 2011-11-23 — Notice of start of opposition period created, to be sent to ib
  • 2011-11-26 — Notification processed by ib
  • 2011-11-29 — Attorney review completed
  • 2011-12-06 — Registered-principal register
  • 2012-03-06 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-03-08 — Paper received
  • 2012-03-08 — Sec 7 request filed
  • 2012-04-13 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2012-04-23 — Correction under section 7 - processed
  • 2012-05-04 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-05-04 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2012-06-06 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
  • 2013-04-21 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2017-11-07 — Teas section 71 received
  • 2017-11-15 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
  • 2017-11-30 — Post registration action mailed - sec.71
  • 2017-12-21 — New representative at ib received
  • 2018-02-01 — Change of owner received from ib
  • 2018-07-13 — Cancelled section 71
  • 2019-03-13 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection created
  • 2019-03-19 — Generic madrid transaction sent to ib
  • 2019-03-19 — Generic madrid transaction created
  • 2019-04-12 — Total invalidation processed by the ib
  • 2020-02-18 — Final status recorded
  • 2021-04-23 — Death of international registration
  • 2021-04-23 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg e-mailed

Owner Information

HYDROVER, WATER SOLUTIONS, S.L.U.
ES
STARAQUA WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS, S.L.
San Sebastián de los Reyes, Madrid ES
STARAQUA WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS, S.L.
San Sebastián de los Reyes, Madrid ES
STARAQUA WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS, S.L.
San Sebastián de los Reyes, Madrid ES

Correspondent

Samuel F. Pamias Hoglund & Pamias, P.S.C.
256 Eleanor Roosevelt
San Juan, PR 00918
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2010-02-18
Status Date:
2020-02-18
Category:
Lighting & Heating
Filing Year:
2010

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.