Brandinium

Trademark search for:

SENKAUTO

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2017-12-07 — Application filed
  • 2017-12-11 — Application filed
  • 2017-12-19 — Application filed
  • 2018-03-19 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2018-03-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2018-03-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2018-03-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2018-04-09 — Office action issued
  • 2018-04-18 — Assigned to lie
  • 2018-04-18 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2018-04-18 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2018-05-03 — Office action issued
  • 2018-05-03 — Office action issued
  • 2018-05-03 — Office action issued
  • 2018-06-20 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2018-06-27 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2018-06-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2018-07-17 — Action req for recon denied no appeal filed counted not mailed
  • 2018-07-17 — Action for req for recon denied no appeal filed e-mailed
  • 2018-07-17 — Notification for req for recon denied no appeal filed
  • 2018-09-13 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2018-09-13 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2018-09-13 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2018-09-13 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2018-09-13 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2018-09-13 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2018-09-13 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2018-09-17 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2018-09-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2018-09-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2018-09-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2018-09-18 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2018-10-09 — Action req for recon denied no appeal filed counted not mailed
  • 2018-10-09 — Action for req for recon denied no appeal filed e-mailed
  • 2018-10-09 — Notification for req for recon denied no appeal filed
  • 2018-10-14 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2018-10-14 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2018-10-17 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2018-10-17 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2018-10-17 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
  • 2018-10-17 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2018-11-26 — Examiners amendment -written
  • 2018-11-26 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2018-11-26 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
  • 2018-11-26 — Examiner's amendment entered
  • 2018-11-26 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2018-12-12 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
  • 2019-01-01 — Published for opposition
  • 2019-01-01 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
  • 2019-02-26 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2019-02-26 — Teas statement of use received
  • 2019-02-26 — Use amendment filed
  • 2019-03-16 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
  • 2019-03-16 — Statement of use processing complete
  • 2019-03-18 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
  • 2019-03-19 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
  • 2019-04-23 — Registered-principal register
  • 2024-04-23 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
  • 2025-11-07 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
  • 2025-11-07 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Autolizer Inc.
South El Monte , CA
Autolizer Inc.
South El Monte , CA
Autolizer Inc.
South El Monte , CA

Correspondent

Charlie Chiang
900 Turnbull Canyon Road Unit A
City of Industry, CA 91745
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2017-12-07
Status Date:
2025-11-07
Category:
Lighting & Heating
Filing Year:
2017

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.