Trademark search for:

NEW IDEA

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1993-04-23 — Application filed
1993-08-11 — Assigned to examiner
1993-08-12 — Examiner's amendment mailed
1993-08-17 — Approved for pub - principal register
1993-12-10 — Notice of publication
1994-01-11 — Published for opposition
1994-04-05 — Registered-principal register
1999-08-30 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
1999-12-13 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2004-03-30 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2004-03-30 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2004-05-26 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8 & 9
2004-09-07 — Paper received
2004-09-07 — Response received to post reg. action - sec. 8 & 9
2004-10-06 — Fax received
2004-10-07 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2004-10-07 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 10 yrs)
2008-10-20 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2008-10-20 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2009-09-26 — Review of correspondence complete
2011-02-23 — Case file in ticrs
2011-04-27 — Case file in ticrs
2016-02-26 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2016-02-26 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

AGCO CORPORATION
DULUTH , GA

ALLIED PRODUCTS CORPORATION
Chicago , IL

ALLIED PRODUCTS CORPORATION
Chicago , IL

ALLIED PRODUCTS CORPORATION
Chicago , IL

Correspondent

Auma N. Reggy, Esq. Adorno & Yoss LLC
1349 West Peachtree Street, N.E.
Suite 1500
Atlanta, GA 30309

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1993-04-23

Status Date:
2016-02-26

Category:
Machines

Filing Year:
1930

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.