Trademark search for:

RUFF-N-CUTT

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1961-09-11 — Application filed
1982-06-19 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 20 yrs)
1982-06-19 — Registered and renewed (first renewal - 20 yrs)
1984-10-25 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
1987-07-24 — Miscellaneous paper
2002-05-22 — Paper received
2002-05-22 — Registered - combined section 8 (10-yr) & sec. 9 filed
2002-08-05 — Teas change of correspondence received
2002-08-05 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2002-08-05 — Registered and renewed (second renewal - 10 yrs)
2005-07-21 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2005-07-21 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2008-10-30 — Case file in ticrs
2012-06-19 — Teas section 8 & 9 received
2012-06-29 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2012-06-29 — Registered - sec. 8 (10-yr) accepted/sec. 9 granted
2012-06-29 — Registered and renewed (third renewal - 10 yrs)
2012-06-29 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 9 - e-mailed
2021-06-19 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2022-12-30 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2022-12-30 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

DAUPHIN PRECISION TOOL, LLC
MILLERSBURG , PA

FASTCUT TOOL CORPORATION
TROY , MI

Colt Industries Operating Corp.
West Hartford , CT

PRATT & WHITNEY COMPANY, INCORPORATED
WEST HARTFORD , CT

Correspondent

Richard D. Getz O'SHEA GETZ P.C.
SUITE 912
1500 MAIN STREET
SPRINGFIELD, MA 01115

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1961-09-11

Status Date:
2022-12-30

Category:
Machines

Filing Year:
1961

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.