Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Machines ›
1983 ›
SO ›
SOLLICH-ENROMAT
Trademark search for:
SOLLICH-ENROMAT
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
1983-10-05 — Application filed
1984-04-06 — Final disposition recorded
1984-06-18 — Correspondence received in law office
1984-08-06 — Letter of suspension mailed
1984-08-16 — Examiners amendment mailed
1984-08-20 — Letter of suspension mailed
1985-01-28 — Correspondence received in law office
1985-01-28 — Correspondence received in law office
1985-03-11 — Allowance/count withdrawn
1985-03-11 — Correspondence received in law office
1985-05-14 — Final disposition recorded
1985-07-02 — Correspondence received in law office
1985-07-16 — Approved for pub - principal register
1985-08-25 — Notice of publication
1985-09-24 — Published for opposition
1985-12-03 — Registered-principal register
1991-06-07 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
1991-10-17 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2005-02-04 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2005-02-04 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2006-01-17 — Case file in ticrs
2006-09-09 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2006-09-09 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
SOLLICH KG
BAD SALZUFLEN DE
SOLLICH GMBH & CO. KG
BAD SALZUFLEN DE
SOLLICH GMBH & CO. KG
BAD SALZUFLEN DE
SOLLICH GMBH & CO. KG
BAD SALZUFLEN DE
Correspondent
GEORGE M THOMAS THOMAS, KAYDEN, HORSTEMEYER & RISLEY, LL 100 GALLERIA PKWY NW STE 1750 ATLANTA, GA 30339 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
1983-10-05
Status Date:
2006-09-09
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.