Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Machines ›
1994 ›
SU ›
SULZER BINGHAM
Trademark search for:
SULZER BINGHAM
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-06-18 — Application filed
2007-06-22 — Application filed
2007-09-20 — Assigned to examiner
2007-09-21 — Final disposition recorded
2007-09-24 — Final disposition recorded
2008-03-20 — Office action issued
2008-03-20 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-03-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-03-25 — Final disposition recorded
2008-03-25 — Final disposition recorded
2008-09-25 — Office action issued
2008-09-25 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-09-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-09-27 — Office action issued
2008-09-29 — Office action issued
2009-03-27 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2009-03-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-03-28 — Assigned to lie
2009-03-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-05-20 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-05-20 — Law office publication review completed
2009-06-03 — Notice of publication
2009-06-23 — Published for opposition
2009-09-15 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2010-03-15 — Sou teas extension received
2010-03-15 — Sou extension 1 filed
2010-03-15 — Sou extension 1 granted
2010-03-17 — Notice of approval of extension request mailed
2010-07-16 — Teas statement of use received
2010-07-16 — Use amendment filed
2010-08-05 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2010-08-05 — Statement of use processing complete
2010-08-30 — Final disposition recorded
2010-08-31 — Final disposition recorded
2011-02-28 — Office action issued
2011-02-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-03-01 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-03-03 — Office action issued
2011-03-03 — Office action issued
2011-09-29 — Application abandoned
2011-09-29 — Application abandoned
2011-11-29 — Office action issued
2011-11-29 — Teas petition to revive received
2011-12-08 — Assigned to petition staff
2011-12-09 — Incomplete petition notice mailed
2011-12-16 — Teas response to petition deficiency received
2011-12-16 — Communication received from petitioner
2012-01-31 — Petition granted - ttab appeal filed
2012-03-01 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2012-03-01 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2012-03-01 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2012-03-07 — Final disposition recorded
2012-03-08 — Action denying req for recon mailed
2012-06-08 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2012-06-29 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2012-07-20 — Assigned to lie
2012-07-23 — Law office registration review completed
2012-07-24 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use mailed
2012-08-28 — Exparte appeal terminated
2012-08-28 — Registered-principal register
2014-03-24 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2014-03-24 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2015-11-11 — Teas change of correspondence received
2017-08-28 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2018-08-08 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2018-08-14 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2018-08-14 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2018-08-14 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
2021-08-28 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2023-03-10 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2023-03-10 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Sulzer Management A.G.
Winterthur CH
Sulzer Management A.G.
Winterthur CH
Sulzer Management A.G.
Winterthur CH
Correspondent
Michael T. Murphy Global IP Counselors LLP Suite 600 1233 Twentieth Street NW Washington, DC 20036
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-06-18
Status Date:
2023-03-10
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.