Trademark search for:

BEARING MATE

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1997-09-10 — Application filed
1997-10-20 — Correspondence received in law office
1998-06-03 — Assigned to examiner
1998-06-04 — Assigned to examiner
1998-06-04 — Assigned to examiner
1998-06-10 — Examiner's amendment mailed
1998-06-22 — Approved for pub - principal register
1998-08-14 — Notice of publication
1998-09-15 — Published for opposition
1998-12-08 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
1999-06-03 — Sou extension 1 filed
1999-07-01 — Sou extension 1 granted
1999-12-07 — Sou extension 2 filed
2000-02-03 — Sou extension 2 granted
2000-06-07 — Use amendment filed
2000-08-11 — Statement of use processing complete
2000-08-16 — Assigned to examiner
2000-08-17 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2000-10-24 — Registered-principal register
2001-01-22 — Sec 7 request filed
2001-02-26 — Correction under section 7 - processed
2005-08-24 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2005-08-24 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2006-01-20 — Case file in ticrs
2007-07-28 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2007-07-28 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

KOREA LEADING TECHNOLOGY CO LTD
PAJU, KYUNNGGI-DO KR

Korea Lube-Tech Limited
Paju, Kyunggi-do KR

Korea Lube-Tech Limited
Paju, Kyunggi-do KR

Correspondent

DAVID A HARLOW NELSON MULLINS RILEY & SCARBOROUGH LLP
GLENLAKE ONE, STE 200
4140 PARKLAKE AVE
RALEIGH, NC 27612

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1997-09-10

Status Date:
2007-07-28

Category:
Machines

Filing Year:
1997

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.