Trademark search for:

THINKTRAC

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

1999-08-25 — Application filed
1999-12-02 — Assigned to examiner
1999-12-07 — Assigned to examiner
1999-12-16 — Examiner's amendment mailed
2000-01-04 — Approved for pub - principal register
2000-02-25 — Notice of publication
2000-03-28 — Published for opposition
2000-06-20 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2000-11-10 — Sou extension 1 filed
2000-11-10 — Sou extension 1 granted
2001-06-20 — Sou extension 2 filed
2001-06-20 — Sou extension 2 granted
2001-06-20 — Divisional request received
2001-06-20 — Use amendment filed
2001-10-03 — Statement of use processing complete
2001-10-06 — Divisional processing complete
2001-10-19 — Correspondence received in law office
2001-10-25 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2001-12-27 — Assigned to examiner
2002-01-04 — Previous allowance count withdrawn
2002-02-01 — Assigned to examiner
2002-02-13 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2002-05-07 — Registered-principal register
2006-02-23 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2006-02-23 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2007-08-20 — Case file in ticrs
2009-02-14 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2009-02-14 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Senco Products, Inc.
Cincinnati , OH

Senco Products, Inc.
Cincinnati , OH

Senco Products, Inc.
Cincinnati , OH

Correspondent

LOUIS K EBLING GREENEBAUM DOLL & MCDONALD PLLC
2800 CHEMED CTR
255 E FIFTH ST
CINCINNATI, OH 45202

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1999-08-25

Status Date:
2009-02-14

Category:
Machines

Filing Year:
1999

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.