Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Machines ›
2003 ›
ES ›
ESPRESSIVA
Trademark search for:
ESPRESSIVA
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2003-11-03 — Application filed
2003-11-25 — Preliminary/voluntary amendment - entered
2003-11-25 — Paper received
2003-11-25 — Correspondence received in law office
2003-11-26 — Application filed
2004-05-28 — Final disposition recorded
2004-05-28 — Assigned to examiner
2004-06-17 — Paper received
2004-06-17 — Amendment from applicant entered
2004-06-17 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-07-04 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2005-01-04 — Suspension inquiry written
2005-01-04 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2005-02-09 — Paper received
2005-02-09 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-03-16 — Amendment from applicant entered
2005-03-16 — Assigned to lie
2005-03-17 — Suspension letter written
2005-03-17 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2005-07-10 — Teas change of correspondence received
2005-09-19 — Suspension inquiry written
2005-09-19 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2006-04-16 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-04-17 — Paper received
2006-04-17 — Petition to revive-received
2006-04-17 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-05-25 — Petition granted - response received
2006-06-15 — Amendment from applicant entered
2006-06-16 — Amendment from applicant entered
2006-06-20 — Suspension letter written
2006-06-20 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2006-12-21 — Suspension inquiry written
2006-12-21 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2007-05-22 — Paper received
2007-05-22 — Assigned to lie
2007-05-23 — Suspension letter written
2007-05-23 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2007-05-23 — Amendment from applicant entered
2007-05-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-11-24 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2007-11-26 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2007-11-26 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2007-11-26 — Suspension inquiry written
2007-11-26 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2007-11-26 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2007-11-26 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-11-26 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2008-03-06 — Suspension letter written
2008-03-06 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2008-03-06 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2008-03-06 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-09-08 — Suspension inquiry written
2008-09-08 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2008-09-08 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2009-02-23 — Examiners amendment -written
2009-02-23 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2009-02-23 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-02-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-02-23 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2009-02-23 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2009-02-23 — Examiner's amendment entered
2009-02-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-02-24 — Law office publication review completed
2009-03-11 — Notice of publication
2009-03-31 — Published for opposition
2009-06-16 — Registered-principal register
2014-02-24 — Cancellation instituted no. 999999
2014-06-27 — Cancellation granted no. 999999
2014-07-08 — Cancellation terminated no. 999999
2014-07-08 — Cancelled section 18-total
2014-07-08 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
PETRA-ELECTRIC PETER HOHLFELDT GmbH & Co. KG
BURGAU DE
PETRA-ELECTRIC PETER HOHLFELDT GmbH & Co. KG
BURGAU DE
PETRA-ELECTRIC PETER HOHLFELDT GmbH & Co. KG
BURGAU DE
Correspondent
KATRINA EDGE BAKER & HOSTETLER LLP WASHINGTON SQUARE SUITE 1100 1050 CONNECTICUT AVENUE NW WASHINGTON, DC 20036
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2003-11-03
Status Date:
2014-07-08
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.