Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Machines ›
2003 ›
SE ›
SELNI
Trademark search for:
SELNI
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2003-10-21 — Application filed
2003-11-13 — Application filed
2004-02-09 — Paper received
2004-02-09 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-05-23 — Assigned to examiner
2004-05-26 — Final disposition recorded
2004-11-24 — Office action issued
2004-11-24 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-11-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2005-01-05 — Office action issued
2005-01-05 — Office action issued
2005-06-09 — Office action issued
2005-06-09 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-06-14 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2005-06-23 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-06-24 — Assigned to lie
2005-06-28 — Law office publication review completed
2005-09-28 — Notice of publication
2005-10-18 — Published for opposition
2005-12-20 — Assigned to examiner
2006-01-10 — Registered-principal register
2012-07-09 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2012-07-16 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2012-07-19 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2012-09-11 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2012-09-11 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
2016-08-12 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2016-08-12 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Brandt Components
Nevers FR
Brandt Components
Nevers FR
Brandt Components
Nevers FR
Correspondent
Howard S. Michael BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONE P.O. BOX 10395 CHICAGO, IL 60610 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2003-10-21
Status Date:
2016-08-12
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.