Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Machines ›
2004 ›
EC ›
ECTUS
Trademark search for:
ECTUS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-07-13 — Application filed
2004-07-20 — Application filed
2005-02-16 — Final disposition recorded
2005-02-16 — Assigned to examiner
2005-02-17 — Final disposition recorded
2005-08-18 — Paper received
2005-08-18 — Correspondence received in law office
2005-09-06 — Amendment from applicant entered
2005-09-08 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-09-09 — Assigned to lie
2005-09-14 — Law office publication review completed
2005-10-19 — Notice of publication
2005-11-08 — Published for opposition
2006-01-31 — Registered-principal register
2011-06-01 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2011-06-01 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2011-06-02 — Teas change of owner address received
2011-06-02 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2011-07-06 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2011-08-16 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2011-08-16 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2011-08-16 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
2015-01-31 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2016-09-02 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2016-09-02 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Tokyo Electron Limited
Tokyo JP
Tokyo Electron Limited
Minato-ku, Tokyo JP
Tokyo Electron Limited
Minato-ku, Tokyo JP
Correspondent
Mark I. Peroff, Esq. HISCOCK & BARCLAY LLP 44TH FLOOR SEVEN TIMES SQUARE NEW YORK, NY 10036
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-07-13
Status Date:
2016-09-02
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.