Brandinium

Trademark search for:

FUTURE MOTOR COMPANY

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2004-06-21 — Application filed
  • 2004-07-02 — Application filed
  • 2005-01-24 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2005-01-27 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-01-28 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2005-07-11 — Paper received
  • 2005-07-11 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2005-07-19 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2005-08-02 — Suspension letter written
  • 2005-08-02 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2006-02-02 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2006-08-02 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2007-02-05 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2007-08-06 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2008-01-08 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2008-02-06 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2008-02-06 — Assigned to lie
  • 2008-08-06 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2009-02-06 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2009-08-06 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2010-02-06 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2010-08-10 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2011-02-10 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2011-08-15 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2012-02-15 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2012-08-16 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2013-02-22 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2013-09-06 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2014-03-10 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2014-09-15 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2015-03-16 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2015-09-21 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2016-03-21 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2016-03-21 — Assigned to lie
  • 2016-09-21 — Assigned to lie
  • 2016-09-26 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2017-04-20 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2017-10-25 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2018-05-02 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2018-11-09 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2019-05-10 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2019-05-13 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2019-11-05 — Paper received
  • 2019-11-15 — Assigned to lie
  • 2019-11-20 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2019-11-20 — Amendment from applicant entered
  • 2019-11-26 — Suspension letter written
  • 2019-11-27 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 2020-05-27 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2020-12-03 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2021-06-03 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2021-12-03 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2022-06-08 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2022-12-06 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2023-06-05 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2023-12-03 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
  • 2024-09-17 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
  • 2024-10-09 — Office action issued
  • 2024-10-10 — Office action issued
  • 2024-10-23 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2024-10-23 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2024-10-23 — Application filed
  • 2024-10-23 — Application filed
  • 2024-10-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2024-11-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2024-11-20 — Office action issued
  • 2024-11-20 — Final disposition recorded
  • 2024-11-22 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2024-11-22 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2024-11-22 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2024-11-25 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2024-11-25 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2024-11-25 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2024-11-25 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2024-11-25 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2024-11-25 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2024-11-26 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 2024-11-26 — Notification for req for recon denied no appeal filed
  • 2024-11-26 — Action req for recon denied no appeal filed counted not mailed
  • 2024-11-26 — Action for req for recon denied no appeal filed e-mailed
  • 2024-11-26 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2024-11-26 — Teas request for reconsideration received
  • 2024-11-28 — Teas petition to director received
  • 2024-11-29 — Teas/email correspondence entered
  • 2024-12-10 — Suspension letter written
  • 2024-12-10 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2024-12-10 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
  • 2024-12-20 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
  • 2025-02-24 — Assigned to petition staff
  • 2025-03-11 — Application abandoned
  • 2025-04-02 — Petition to director denied
  • 2025-04-02 — Attorney review/decision on amendment required
  • 2025-04-29 — Application abandoned
  • 2025-04-29 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

ANDERSON, KENT G
Bismarck , ND

Correspondent

ANDERSON, KENT G
925 N Griffin
Bismarck, ND 58501
United States

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2004-06-21
Status Date:
2025-04-29
Category:
Machines
Filing Year:
2004

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.