Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Machines ›
2006 ›
DA ›
DAYTAN
Trademark search for:
DAYTAN
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-08-02 — Application filed
2006-08-08 — Application filed
2006-08-09 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2006-12-28 — Final disposition recorded
2006-12-28 — Final disposition recorded
2006-12-28 — Assigned to examiner
2007-05-08 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2007-05-08 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2007-06-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-06-26 — Office action issued
2007-06-26 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-06-27 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-08-13 — Assigned to lie
2007-08-13 — Law office publication review completed
2007-08-29 — Notice of publication
2007-09-18 — Published for opposition
2007-12-04 — Registered-principal register
2008-04-23 — Assignment of ownership not updated automatically
2013-02-28 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2013-03-15 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2013-03-15 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2013-03-15 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
2016-12-04 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2018-07-06 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2018-07-06 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Dayton Progress Corporation
Dayton , OH
Dayton Progress Corporation
Dayton , OH
Dayton Progress Corporation
Dayton , OH
Correspondent
William R. Allen, Ph.D. WOOD, HERRON & EVANS, LLP 441 Vine St. 2700 Carew Tower CINCINNATI, OH 45202
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-08-02
Status Date:
2018-07-06
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.