Trademark search for:

ESHAFT CASE 60

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2006-11-08 — Application filed
2006-11-14 — Application filed
2006-11-15 — Notice of design search code mailed
2007-03-15 — Assigned to examiner
2007-03-22 — Final disposition recorded
2007-03-22 — Final disposition recorded
2007-04-10 — Office action issued
2007-04-10 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-04-11 — Approved for pub - principal register
2007-04-11 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-05-01 — Assigned to lie
2007-05-01 — Law office publication review completed
2007-06-15 — Withdrawn from pub - tqr/non-atty request
2007-07-04 — Notice of publication
2007-07-24 — Published for opposition
2007-10-09 — Registered-principal register
2013-09-12 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) filed
2013-09-12 — Teas change of correspondence received
2013-09-12 — Teas section 8 received
2013-09-15 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2013-09-16 — Post registration action mailed - sec. 8
2013-09-24 — Office action issued
2013-09-27 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2013-09-27 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 - e-mailed
2016-10-09 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2018-05-11 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2018-05-11 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

eShaft Limited
Warren , OH

eShaft Limited
Warren , OH

eShaft Limited
Warren , OH

Correspondent

eShaft Limited
766 N RIVER RD NW
Attn: Thomas Lussier
WARREN, OH 44483

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2006-11-08

Status Date:
2018-05-11

Category:
Machines

Filing Year:
2006

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.