Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Machines ›
2006 ›
SO ›
SOLUPOL
Trademark search for:
SOLUPOL
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2006-10-30 — Application filed
2006-11-02 — Application filed
2007-01-26 — Assigned to examiner
2007-01-29 — Final disposition recorded
2007-01-29 — Final disposition recorded
2007-07-30 — Office action issued
2007-07-30 — Correspondence received in law office
2007-07-31 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2007-08-22 — Final disposition recorded
2007-08-22 — Final disposition recorded
2007-08-22 — Final disposition recorded
2008-02-21 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-02-21 — Office action issued
2008-02-21 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-03-03 — Suspension letter written
2008-03-03 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2008-03-03 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2008-09-03 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2008-09-03 — Assigned to lie
2008-09-03 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2009-03-03 — Suspension inquiry written
2009-03-03 — Inquiry to suspension e-mailed
2009-03-03 — Notification of inquiry as to suspension e-mailed
2009-03-03 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2009-10-01 — Application abandoned
2009-10-01 — Application abandoned
2009-10-01 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Bioprogress Technology Limited
Cambridge GB
Correspondent
BINGHAM B LEVERICH ESQ COVINGTON & BURLING LLP 1201 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW WASHINGTON, DC 20004-2401 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2006-10-30
Status Date:
2009-10-01
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.