Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Machines ›
2007 ›
MO ›
MONODRESS
Trademark search for:
MONODRESS
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2007-11-05 — Application filed
2007-11-08 — Application filed
2007-11-09 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2008-02-16 — Assigned to examiner
2008-02-20 — Final disposition recorded
2008-02-21 — Final disposition recorded
2008-02-24 — Final disposition recorded
2008-02-25 — Final disposition recorded
2008-08-22 — Office action issued
2008-09-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2008-09-02 — Assigned to lie
2008-09-02 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-09-17 — Suspension letter written
2008-09-18 — Letter of suspension mailed
2009-03-19 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2009-03-21 — Suspension inquiry written
2009-03-23 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
2009-09-22 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2009-09-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-09-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-09-24 — Suspension inquiry written
2009-09-25 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
2010-03-18 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2010-03-18 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-03-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-03-25 — Suspension inquiry written
2010-03-25 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
2010-09-27 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2010-09-27 — Suspension letter written
2010-09-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-09-27 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-09-28 — Letter of suspension mailed
2011-03-28 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2011-04-04 — Suspension inquiry written
2011-04-05 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
2011-09-28 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2011-09-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-09-29 — Suspension letter written
2011-09-29 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-09-30 — Letter of suspension mailed
2012-04-21 — Suspension inquiry written
2012-04-23 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
2012-08-29 — Automatic update of assignment of ownership
2012-10-23 — Teas response to suspension inquiry received
2012-10-23 — Correspondence received in law office
2012-10-24 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2012-11-09 — Final disposition recorded
2012-11-13 — Final disposition recorded
2013-05-13 — Examiners amendment mailed
2013-05-13 — Examiners amendment -written
2013-05-13 — Examiner's amendment entered
2013-05-14 — Examiners amendment -written
2013-05-14 — Examiner's amendment entered
2013-05-15 — Examiners amendment mailed
2013-05-21 — Approved for pub - principal register
2013-05-22 — Law office publication review completed
2013-06-05 — Notice of publication
2013-06-25 — Published for opposition
2013-08-20 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2013-09-05 — Teas delete 1(b) basis received
2013-09-05 — Notice of allowance cancelled
2013-10-10 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2013-10-10 — 1(b) basis deleted; proceed to registration
2013-11-19 — Registered-principal register
2017-01-31 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-04-05 — Review of correspondence complete - address updated
2020-06-26 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2020-06-26 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
ELEMENT SIX ABRASIVES TREASURY LIMITED
COUNTY CLARE IE
ELEMENT SIX ABRASIVES TREASURY LIMITED
COUNTY CLARE IE
ELEMENT SIX ABRASIVES TREASURY LIMITED
COUNTY CLARE IE
Element Six
County Clare IE
Correspondent
ANDREW N. FREDBECK FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, P.C. 4 TIMES SQUARE, 17TH FLOOR NEW YORK, NY 10036 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2007-11-05
Status Date:
2020-06-26
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.