Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Machines ›
2008 ›
DI ›
DINGHY BUTLER
Trademark search for:
DINGHY BUTLER
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2008-08-03 — Application filed
2008-08-06 — Application filed
2008-11-12 — Final disposition recorded
2008-11-12 — Final disposition recorded
2008-11-12 — Assigned to examiner
2008-11-12 — Final disposition recorded
2008-11-19 — Paper received
2008-12-03 — Amendment from applicant entered
2008-12-03 — Assigned to lie
2008-12-03 — Correspondence received in law office
2008-12-15 — Examiners amendment -written
2008-12-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
2008-12-15 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2008-12-15 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2008-12-15 — Examiner's amendment entered
2008-12-17 — Law office publication review completed
2008-12-31 — Notice of publication
2009-01-20 — Published for opposition
2009-04-14 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2009-05-28 — Teas statement of use received
2009-05-28 — Use amendment filed
2009-06-19 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2009-06-19 — Statement of use processing complete
2009-07-09 — Final disposition recorded
2009-07-09 — Final disposition recorded
2009-07-09 — Final disposition recorded
2010-02-04 — Application abandoned
2010-02-04 — Application abandoned
2010-02-04 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
SHULMAN, RICHARD J
ELIOT , ME
SHULMAN, RICHARD J
ELIOT , ME
Correspondent
SHULMAN, RICHARD J 40 MITRA LN ELIOT, ME 03903-2118 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2008-08-03
Status Date:
2010-02-04
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.