Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Machines ›
2012 ›
OR ›
ORCHARD MASTER EQUIP
Trademark search for:
ORCHARD MASTER EQUIP
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2012-08-03 — Application filed
2012-08-07 — Application filed
2012-08-13 — Application filed
2012-12-01 — Assigned to examiner
2012-12-04 — Final disposition recorded
2012-12-04 — Final disposition recorded
2012-12-04 — Final disposition recorded
2013-06-04 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-06-04 — Office action issued
2013-06-04 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-07-01 — Office action issued
2013-07-01 — Office action issued
2013-07-01 — Office action issued
2013-10-25 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received
2013-10-25 — Withdrawal of attorney granted
2014-01-29 — Examiners amendment mailed
2014-01-29 — Examiners amendment -written
2014-01-29 — Approved for pub - principal register
2014-01-29 — Examiner's amendment entered
2014-02-17 — Assigned to lie
2014-02-18 — Law office publication review completed
2014-03-05 — Notice of publication
2014-03-25 — Published for opposition
2014-04-23 — Extension of time to oppose received
2014-08-08 — Extension of time to oppose process - terminated
2014-09-23 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2015-04-27 — Application abandoned
2015-04-27 — Application abandoned
2015-04-27 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Smith, James
Butte City , CA
Smith, James
Butte City , CA
Correspondent
Smith, James PO BOX 154 Butte City, CA 95920 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2012-08-03
Status Date:
2015-04-27
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.