Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Machines ›
2012 ›
SL ›
SLIMHOLE JET PUMP
Trademark search for:
SLIMHOLE JET PUMP
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2012-07-25 — Application filed
2012-07-28 — Application filed
2012-07-31 — Application filed
2012-08-01 — Notice of pseudo mark mailed
2012-11-21 — Assigned to examiner
2012-11-29 — Final disposition recorded
2012-11-29 — Final disposition recorded
2012-11-29 — Final disposition recorded
2013-05-29 — Teas amendment of use received
2013-05-29 — Office action issued
2013-05-29 — Correspondence received in law office
2013-05-30 — Amendment to use processing complete
2013-05-30 — Use amendment filed
2013-05-30 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2013-07-01 — Suspension letter written
2013-07-01 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2013-07-01 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2014-01-14 — Assigned to lie
2014-01-24 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2014-07-28 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2015-02-02 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2015-08-06 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2015-08-26 — Final disposition recorded
2015-08-26 — Final disposition recorded
2015-08-26 — Final disposition recorded
2016-02-26 — Teas change of correspondence received
2016-02-26 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-02-26 — Office action issued
2016-02-26 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-04-11 — Office action issued
2016-04-11 — Office action issued
2016-04-11 — Office action issued
2016-04-20 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received
2016-04-20 — Withdrawal of attorney granted
2016-05-19 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2016-05-19 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2016-10-04 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2016-10-04 — Correspondence received in law office
2016-10-05 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2016-11-18 — Final disposition recorded
2016-11-18 — Final disposition recorded
2016-11-18 — Final disposition recorded
2017-05-18 — Office action issued
2017-05-18 — Correspondence received in law office
2017-05-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2017-07-14 — Office action issued
2017-07-14 — Final disposition recorded
2017-07-14 — Final disposition recorded
2018-01-12 — Teas request for reconsideration received
2018-01-12 — Exparte appeal received at ttab
2018-01-12 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2018-01-12 — Ex parte appeal-instituted
2018-01-18 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-01-18 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-01-30 — Final disposition recorded
2018-01-30 — Final disposition recorded
2018-01-30 — Final disposition recorded
2018-07-26 — Office action issued
2018-07-26 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-07-27 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-08-27 — Final disposition recorded
2018-08-27 — Notification of action denying req for recon e-mailed
2018-08-27 — Action denying req for recon e-mailed
2018-11-17 — Jurisdiction restored to examining attorney
2019-01-16 — Examiners statement - completed
2019-01-16 — Notification of examiners statement e-mailed
2019-01-16 — Examiners statement e-mailed
2019-02-05 — Reply brief filed - check ttab files
2019-03-28 — Office action issued
2019-06-12 — Application abandoned
2019-06-12 — Exparte appeal terminated
2019-06-12 — Final status recorded
2019-06-13 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
Tech-Flo Consulting LLC
Conroe , TX
Correspondent
TOD T TUMEY TUMEY LLP PO BOX 22188 HOUSTON, TX 77227-2188 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2012-07-25
Status Date:
2019-06-12
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.