Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Machines ›
2014 ›
VI ›
VISIOPLATE
Trademark search for:
VISIOPLATE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2014-05-22 — Application filed
2014-08-21 — Sn assigned for sect 66a appl from ib
2014-08-25 — Application filed
2014-08-29 — Application filed
2014-09-08 — Assigned to examiner
2014-09-13 — Final disposition recorded
2014-09-14 — Office action issued
2014-09-16 — Office action issued
2014-09-16 — Office action issued
2014-10-03 — Office action issued
2014-12-22 — Teas change of correspondence received
2014-12-22 — Office action issued
2014-12-22 — Correspondence received in law office
2014-12-23 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-05-01 — Assigned to examiner
2015-05-22 — Final disposition recorded
2015-05-22 — Final disposition recorded
2015-05-22 — Final disposition recorded
2015-06-01 — Office action issued
2015-06-01 — Correspondence received in law office
2015-06-02 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2015-06-03 — Approved for pub - principal register
2015-06-19 — Assigned to lie
2015-06-19 — Law office publication review completed
2015-07-08 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2015-07-08 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2015-07-08 — Notice of start of opposition period created, to be sent to ib
2015-07-24 — Notification processed by ib
2015-07-28 — Published for opposition
2015-07-28 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2015-10-13 — Registered-principal register
2016-01-13 — Final disposition recorded
2016-02-03 — Final disposition recorded
2016-02-03 — Final disposition recorded
2016-02-20 — Final disposition recorded
2017-03-01 — Teas change of correspondence received
2017-03-09 — Teas change of correspondence received
2020-10-13 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 71 (6-yr) e-mailed
2021-12-30 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2021-12-30 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2021-12-30 — Teas change of owner address received
2021-12-30 — Teas change of owner address received
2021-12-30 — Teas change of correspondence received
2021-12-30 — Teas change of correspondence received
2021-12-30 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2021-12-30 — Applicant/correspondence changes (non-responsive) entered
2021-12-30 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2021-12-30 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2021-12-30 — Teas withdrawal of attorney received-firm retains
2022-01-20 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2022-01-20 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2022-01-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
2022-01-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
2022-01-20 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2022-01-20 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2022-02-12 — Change of name/address rec'd from ib
2022-04-29 — Cancelled section 71
2022-12-29 — Total invalidation of reg ext protection created
2023-02-22 — Generic madrid transaction sent to ib
2023-02-22 — Generic madrid transaction created
2023-03-20 — Total invalidation processed by the ib
2024-05-22 — Final status recorded
2024-12-13 — Death of international registration
2024-12-13 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg e-mailed
Owner Information
Atotech Deutschland GmbH & Co. KG Kommanditgesellschaft (limited partnership)
DE
Atotech Deutschland GmbH
Berlin DE
Atotech Deutschland GmbH
Berlin DE
Correspondent
William F. Lawrence, Esq. HAUG PARTNERS LLP 745 Fifth Avenue NEW YORK, NY 10151 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2014-05-22
Status Date:
2024-05-22
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.