Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Machines ›
2015 ›
TR ›
TRIDENT CUTTER
Trademark search for:
TRIDENT CUTTER
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2018-05-10 — Application filed
2018-05-14 — Application filed
2018-05-19 — Application filed
2018-08-31 — Assigned to examiner
2018-09-12 — Final disposition recorded
2018-09-12 — Final disposition recorded
2018-09-12 — Final disposition recorded
2019-04-10 — Application abandoned
2019-04-10 — Application abandoned
2019-05-01 — Teas petition to revive received
2019-05-01 — Petition to revive-granted
2019-05-01 — Office action issued
2019-05-01 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2019-05-08 — Assigned to lie
2019-05-13 — Correspondence received in law office
2019-05-13 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2019-06-16 — Suspension letter written
2019-06-16 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2019-06-16 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2020-01-06 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2020-07-28 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2021-07-06 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2021-10-15 — Final disposition recorded
2021-10-15 — Final disposition recorded
2021-10-15 — Final disposition recorded
2022-05-02 — Application abandoned
2022-05-02 — Application abandoned
2022-05-02 — Application abandoned
2022-05-02 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Chengdu Best Diamond Bit Co., Ltd.
CHENGDU CN
Correspondent
PATRICK REILLY P.O. BOX 7218 SANTA CRUZ, CA 95061-7218 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2018-05-10
Status Date:
2022-05-02
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.