Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Machines ›
2016 ›
PR ›
PRECONCEIVE MOTION
Trademark search for:
PRECONCEIVE MOTION
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2016-10-25 — Application filed
2016-10-28 — Application filed
2016-10-28 — Application filed
2016-12-14 — Assigned to examiner
2016-12-20 — Examiners amendment -written
2016-12-20 — Examiner's amendment entered
2016-12-20 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2016-12-20 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2016-12-20 — Approved for pub - principal register
2017-01-05 — Assigned to lie
2017-01-10 — Law office publication review completed
2017-01-25 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2017-02-14 — Published for opposition
2017-02-14 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2017-04-11 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2017-09-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
2017-09-20 — Sou teas extension received
2017-09-20 — Sou extension 1 filed
2017-09-20 — Sou extension 1 granted
2017-09-22 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2018-03-30 — Sou teas extension received
2018-03-30 — Sou extension 2 filed
2018-03-30 — Sou extension 2 granted
2018-04-03 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2018-11-12 — Application abandoned
2018-11-12 — Final status recorded
2018-11-13 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
LINTEC OF AMERICA, INC.
Phoenix , AZ
LINTEC OF AMERICA, INC.
Phoenix , AZ
Correspondent
REBECCA C. CHRISTON FINCH & MALONEY PLLC 50 COMMERCIAL STREET, SUITE 300 MANCHESTER, NH 03101 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2016-10-25
Status Date:
2018-11-12
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.