Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Machines ›
2017 ›
EN ›
ENSIVAL MORET
Trademark search for:
ENSIVAL MORET
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2010-05-27 — Application filed
2010-05-31 — Application filed
2010-06-01 — Application filed
2010-06-02 — Notice of design search code mailed
2010-09-10 — Assigned to examiner
2010-09-15 — Final disposition recorded
2010-09-16 — Final disposition recorded
2010-11-18 — Office action issued
2010-11-18 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-11-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-12-09 — Approved for pub - principal register
2011-01-05 — Assigned to lie
2011-01-05 — Law office publication review completed
2011-01-19 — Notice of publication
2011-02-08 — Published for opposition
2011-04-26 — Registered-principal register
2017-03-06 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2017-04-26 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2017-04-26 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2017-04-26 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
2018-02-04 — Teas change of correspondence received
2020-04-26 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2021-11-19 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2021-11-19 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
ENSIVAL MORET BELGIUM
Thimister-Clermont BE
ENSIVAL MORET BELGIUM
Thimister-Clermont BE
ENSIVAL MORET BELGIUM
Thimister-Clermont BE
Correspondent
Ellen Reilly Reilly Intellectual Property Law Firm 1888 N. Sherman Street, Suite 200 DENVER, CO 80203 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2010-05-27
Status Date:
2021-11-19
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.