Brandinium

Trademark search for:

VIATEX

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 2001-12-12 — Application filed
  • 2002-02-26 — Assigned to examiner
  • 2002-03-07 — Examiner's amendment mailed
  • 2002-03-20 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 2002-07-17 — Notice of publication
  • 2002-08-06 — Published for opposition
  • 2002-10-22 — Paper received
  • 2002-10-29 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
  • 2003-03-31 — Paper received
  • 2003-03-31 — Sou extension 1 filed
  • 2003-03-31 — Sou extension 1 granted
  • 2003-10-17 — Paper received
  • 2003-10-17 — Sou extension 2 filed
  • 2003-10-17 — Sou extension 2 granted
  • 2004-04-08 — Paper received
  • 2004-04-08 — Sou extension 3 filed
  • 2004-04-20 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2004-04-22 — Sou extension 3 granted
  • 2004-10-27 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2004-10-27 — Sou extension 4 filed
  • 2004-11-05 — Sou extension 4 granted
  • 2005-04-21 — Teas change of correspondence received
  • 2005-04-29 — Sou teas extension received
  • 2005-04-29 — Sou extension 5 filed
  • 2005-05-19 — Sou extension 5 granted
  • 2005-10-30 — Final status recorded
  • 2006-01-05 — Application abandoned
  • 2006-01-05 — Application abandoned
  • 2008-01-30 — Teas change of correspondence received

Owner Information

Tecomet, Inc.
Wilmington , MA
Tecomet, Inc.
Wilmington , MA

Correspondent

TECOMET, INC. Bricker & Eckler LLP
100 S. Third St.
Att'n Joseph R. Dreitler
Columbus, OH 43215-4291

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2001-12-12
Status Date:
2005-10-30
Category:
Materials Treatment
Filing Year:
2001

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.