Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Materials Treatment ›
2004 ›
VI ›
VIXVI
Trademark search for:
VIXVI
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2004-03-08 — Application filed
2004-03-22 — Application filed
2004-09-22 — Assigned to examiner
2004-09-24 — Assigned to lie
2004-09-27 — Fax received
2004-09-29 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-09-29 — Amendment from applicant entered
2004-10-04 — Examiners amendment and/or priority action - completed
2004-10-06 — Examiner's amendment and/or priority action mailed
2004-10-06 — Assigned to lie
2004-10-06 — Examiner's amendment entered
2004-12-06 — Paper received
2004-12-06 — Correspondence received in law office
2004-12-27 — Amendment from applicant entered
2005-01-05 — Approved for pub - principal register
2005-02-11 — Assigned to lie
2005-02-18 — Law office publication review completed
2005-05-18 — Notice of publication
2005-06-07 — Published for opposition
2005-08-30 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2006-02-10 — Teas change of correspondence received
2006-02-14 — Sou teas extension received
2006-02-14 — Sou extension 1 filed
2006-02-14 — Sou extension 1 granted
2006-02-24 — Teas change of correspondence received
2006-08-29 — Final status recorded
2006-10-31 — Application abandoned
2006-10-31 — Application abandoned
Owner Information
YUPOONG, INC.
Guro-Gu, Seoul KR
YUPOONG, INC.
Guro-Gu, Seoul KR
Correspondent
DAVID M PITCHER STAAS & HALSEY LLP 1201 NEW YORK AVE NW STE 700 WASHINGTON, DC 20005 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2004-03-08
Status Date:
2006-08-29
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.