Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Materials Treatment ›
2008 ›
01 ›
1 LOVE 4 ALL
Trademark search for:
1 LOVE 4 ALL
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2008-07-02 — Application filed
2008-07-07 — Application filed
2008-07-08 — Notice of design search code mailed
2008-10-08 — Assigned to examiner
2008-10-10 — Final disposition recorded
2008-10-10 — Final disposition recorded
2008-10-10 — Final disposition recorded
2009-05-12 — Application abandoned
2009-05-12 — Application abandoned
2009-05-12 — Assigned to examiner
2009-06-05 — Office action issued
2009-06-05 — Petition to revive-granted
2009-06-05 — Teas petition to revive received
2009-06-07 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2009-06-07 — Assigned to lie
2009-06-07 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-06-15 — Final disposition recorded
2009-06-15 — Final disposition recorded
2009-06-15 — Final disposition recorded
2009-06-16 — Undeliverable mail - courtesy copy mailed
2009-12-14 — Paper received
2009-12-28 — Amendment from applicant entered
2009-12-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2009-12-30 — Final disposition recorded
2009-12-30 — Removed from teas plus
2009-12-30 — Final disposition recorded
2009-12-30 — Final disposition recorded
2010-07-28 — Application abandoned
2010-07-28 — Application abandoned
2010-07-28 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Yusuf, Arzo
Mission Viejo , CA
Correspondent
ARZO YUSUF ARZO YUSUF 27758 SANTA MARGARITA PKWY # 323 MISSION VIEJO, CA 92691-6709 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2008-07-02
Status Date:
2010-07-28
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.