Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Materials Treatment ›
2010 ›
PR ›
PRESHAFRUIT
Trademark search for:
PRESHAFRUIT
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2010-06-22 — Application filed
2010-08-12 — Sn assigned for sect 66a subseq desig from ib
2010-08-13 — Application filed
2010-08-13 — New representative at ib received
2010-08-17 — Application filed
2010-09-28 — Final disposition recorded
2010-09-28 — Assigned to examiner
2010-09-29 — Office action issued
2010-09-29 — Office action issued
2010-09-29 — Office action issued
2010-10-16 — Office action issued
2010-10-20 — Final disposition recorded
2010-10-20 — Final disposition recorded
2011-05-18 — Application abandoned
2011-05-18 — Application abandoned
2012-01-18 — Notification of possible opposition sent to ib
2012-01-18 — Notification of possible opposition created, to be sent to ib
2012-03-19 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2012-03-19 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2012-05-18 — Final disposition recorded
2012-05-18 — Final disposition recorded
2012-07-22 — Final disposition recorded
2012-10-24 — Notification of possible opposition - processed by ib
2015-11-26 — New representative at ib received
2019-11-16 — Final status recorded
2021-01-15 — Death of international registration
2021-01-16 — Notification of effect of cancellation of intl reg e-mailed
Correspondent
Gail I. Nevius Abbas, Esq. Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP 1841 Page Mill Rd., Suite 200 Palo Alto, CA 94304 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2010-06-22
Status Date:
2019-11-16
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.