Trademark search for:

CENTER OF THOUGHT

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2006-02-01 — Application filed
2006-02-14 — Application filed
2006-07-24 — Examiners amendment -written
2006-07-24 — Approved for pub - principal register
2006-07-24 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2006-07-24 — Examiner's amendment entered
2006-07-24 — Assigned to examiner
2006-07-28 — Assigned to lie
2006-08-02 — Law office publication review completed
2006-09-06 — Notice of publication
2006-09-26 — Published for opposition
2006-12-19 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2007-02-26 — Use amendment filed
2007-02-26 — Paper received
2007-06-07 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2007-06-07 — Statement of use processing complete
2007-07-11 — Law office registration review completed
2007-07-11 — Assigned to lie
2007-08-14 — Registered-principal register
2012-11-01 — Teas section 8 & 15 received
2012-11-28 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2012-11-28 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
2012-11-28 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 & 15 - e-mailed
2016-08-14 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2018-03-16 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2018-03-16 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

Center of Thought, LLC
Nahant , MA

Center of Thought, LLC
Nahant , MA

Center of Thought, LLC
Nahant , MA

Correspondent

John L. Welch LANDO & ANASTASI, LLP
ONE MAIN STREET, 11th Floor
Cambridge, MA 02142
UNITED STATES

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2006-02-01

Status Date:
2018-03-16

Category:
Medical & Veterinary Services

Filing Year:
2006

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.