Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Medical & Veterinary Services ›
2009 ›
NE ›
NEUROSURGICAL SOLUTIONS OF LAFAYETTE
Trademark search for:
NEUROSURGICAL SOLUTIONS OF LAFAYETTE
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-01-05 — Application filed
2009-01-08 — Application filed
2009-03-20 — Assigned to examiner
2009-03-22 — Assigned to examiner
2009-03-23 — Examiners amendment -written
2009-03-23 — Approved for pub - principal register
2009-03-23 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2009-03-23 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2009-03-23 — Examiner's amendment entered
2009-03-23 — Assigned to lie
2009-03-23 — Law office publication review completed
2009-04-08 — Notice of publication
2009-04-28 — Published for opposition
2009-07-09 — Application abandoned
2009-07-21 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2009-08-12 — Application abandoned
2009-08-12 — Application abandoned
2009-08-12 — Final status recorded
2009-08-17 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2009-08-17 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2009-08-24 — Fax received
2009-08-24 — Fax received
2009-08-24 — Petition to director received
2009-08-27 — Assigned to petition staff
2009-09-08 — Petition to director denied
Owner Information
Neurosurgical Solutions of Lafayette LLC
Lafayette , LA
Neurosurgical Solutions of Lafayette LLC
Lafayette , LA
Correspondent
Gregory A. Nelson Novak Druce + Quigg LLP 525 Okeechobee Blvd., 15th Floor West Palm Beach, FL 33401 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-01-05
Status Date:
2009-08-12
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.