Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Medical & Veterinary Services ›
2009 ›
RU ›
RUNNING DOC
Trademark search for:
RUNNING DOC
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2009-12-29 — Application filed
2010-01-05 — Application filed
2010-03-25 — Assigned to examiner
2010-03-28 — Final disposition recorded
2010-03-28 — Final disposition recorded
2010-03-28 — Final disposition recorded
2010-09-28 — Office action issued
2010-09-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2010-09-29 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2010-11-04 — Final disposition recorded
2010-11-04 — Final disposition recorded
2010-11-04 — Final disposition recorded
2011-05-02 — Office action issued
2011-05-02 — Correspondence received in law office
2011-05-03 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2011-05-25 — Approved for registration supplemental register
2011-05-31 — Assigned to lie
2011-06-02 — Law office publication review completed
2011-07-05 — Registered-supplemental register
2016-07-05 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2017-06-12 — Teas section 8 received
2017-08-07 — Case assigned to post registration paralegal
2017-08-11 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted
2017-08-11 — Notice of acceptance of sec. 8 - e-mailed
2020-07-05 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (10-yr)/sec. 9 e-mailed
2022-01-07 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
2022-01-07 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
Maharam, Lewis
New York , NY
Maharam, Lewis
New York , NY
Correspondent
Daniel Kegan Kegan & Kegan, Ltd 79 W Monroe St #1310 Chicago, IL 60603-4931 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2009-12-29
Status Date:
2022-01-07
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.