Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Medical & Veterinary Services ›
2010 ›
EE ›
E-CEPH WEB
Trademark search for:
E-CEPH WEB
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2010-09-29 — Application filed
2010-10-02 — Application filed
2010-10-04 — Application filed
2010-12-17 — Assigned to examiner
2010-12-21 — Examiners amendment -written
2010-12-21 — Examiners amendment e-mailed
2010-12-21 — Notification of examiners amendment e-mailed
2010-12-21 — Examiner's amendment entered
2010-12-21 — Approved for pub - principal register
2011-01-21 — Assigned to lie
2011-01-21 — Law office publication review completed
2011-03-01 — Published for opposition
2011-03-01 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2011-04-26 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2011-10-21 — Sou teas extension received
2011-10-21 — Sou extension 1 filed
2011-10-21 — Sou extension 1 granted
2011-10-25 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2012-04-17 — Teas statement of use received
2012-04-17 — Use amendment filed
2012-05-10 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2012-05-15 — Statement of use processing complete
2012-06-02 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2012-06-04 — Law office registration review completed
2012-06-05 — Notice of acceptance of statement of use e-mailed
2012-07-10 — Registered-principal register
2017-07-10 — Courtesy reminder - sec. 8 (6-yr) e-mailed
2019-02-15 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2019-02-15 — Final status recorded
Owner Information
RMO, Inc.
RMO, Inc.
RMO, Inc.
Correspondent
SABRINA C. STAVISH SHERIDAN ROSS P.C.
Filing Details
Filing Date:
Status Date:
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.
