Home ›
Trademark Categories ›
Medical & Veterinary Services ›
2017 ›
DR ›
DR. BUDZ
Trademark search for:
DR. BUDZ
No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.
Trademark records may change over time.
For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability,
and social handle checks, run a live search.
Check latest trademark, domains & social handles
Live search · Most up-to-date results
USPTO Filing History
Key events recorded for this trademark application
2017-03-16 — Application filed
2017-03-22 — Application filed
2017-03-23 — Notice of design search code e-mailed
2017-04-11 — Assigned to examiner
2017-10-04 — Assigned to examiner
2017-10-09 — Final disposition recorded
2017-10-09 — Final disposition recorded
2017-10-09 — Final disposition recorded
2018-04-09 — Office action issued
2018-04-18 — Assigned to lie
2018-04-19 — Correspondence received in law office
2018-04-19 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2018-04-25 — Suspension letter written
2018-04-25 — Letter of suspension e-mailed
2018-04-25 — Notification of letter of suspension e-mailed
2018-10-29 — Report completed suspension check case still suspended
2019-04-30 — Suspension checked - to attorney for action
2019-05-23 — Final disposition recorded
2019-05-23 — Final disposition recorded
2019-05-23 — Final disposition recorded
2019-08-07 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2019-08-07 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2019-11-25 — Office action issued
2019-12-03 — Correspondence received in law office
2019-12-03 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2019-12-19 — Office action issued
2019-12-19 — Office action issued
2019-12-19 — Office action issued
2020-07-01 — Application abandoned
2020-07-01 — Application abandoned
2020-07-02 — Teas petition to revive received
2020-07-02 — Office action issued
2020-09-23 — Assigned to petition staff
2020-09-25 — Petition granted - response received
2020-09-25 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2020-09-28 — Correspondence received in law office
2020-09-28 — Teas/email correspondence entered
2020-10-01 — Approved for pub - principal register
2020-10-21 — Notification of notice of publication e-mailed
2020-11-10 — Published for opposition
2020-11-10 — Official gazette publication confirmation e-mailed
2021-01-05 — Noa e-mailed - sou required from applicant
2021-01-20 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2021-01-20 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2021-01-20 — Teas change of correspondence received
2021-07-06 — Sou extension 1 filed
2021-07-19 — Teas petition to revive received
2021-07-19 — Petition to revive-granted
2021-07-19 — Sou extension received with teas petition
2021-07-20 — Notice of revival - e-mailed
2021-08-09 — Case assigned to intent to use paralegal
2021-08-10 — Sou extension 1 granted
2021-08-11 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2022-01-05 — Sou teas extension received
2022-01-05 — Sou extension 2 filed
2022-01-05 — Sou extension 2 granted
2022-01-07 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2022-07-05 — Sou teas extension received
2022-07-05 — Sou extension 3 filed
2022-07-05 — Sou extension 3 granted
2022-07-07 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2023-01-05 — Sou teas extension received
2023-01-05 — Sou extension 4 filed
2023-01-05 — Sou extension 4 granted
2023-01-07 — Notice of approval of extension request e-mailed
2023-08-07 — Application abandoned
2023-08-07 — Application abandoned
2023-08-07 — Final status recorded
2023-08-11 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2023-08-11 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2023-08-11 — Teas change of correspondence received
Owner Information
Allyson Renkin
Encinitas , CA
Allyson Renkin
Encinitas , CA
Correspondent
Gary L. Eastman, Esq. EASTMAN IP 1550 Hotel Circle N, Suite 330 San Diego, CA 92108 UNITED STATES
Filing Details
Filing Date:
2017-03-16
Status Date:
2023-08-07
Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice.
Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.