Brandinium

Trademark search for:

ANDRONIC

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results
Also check across: EU CA AU NZ CH

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

  • 1985-06-26 — Application filed
  • 1985-09-05 — Assigned to examiner
  • 1985-09-30 — Final disposition recorded
  • 1986-03-25 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 1986-04-01 — Assigned to examiner
  • 1986-04-01 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 1986-04-02 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 1986-04-29 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 1986-09-17 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 1987-02-09 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 1987-04-28 — Letter of suspension mailed
  • 1987-09-21 — Inquiry as to suspension mailed
  • 1988-02-16 — Correspondence received in law office
  • 1988-03-15 — Approved for pub - principal register
  • 1988-04-22 — Notice of publication
  • 1988-05-24 — Published for opposition
  • 1988-08-16 — Registered-principal register
  • 1993-10-25 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) & sec. 15 filed
  • 1994-03-16 — Registered - sec. 8 (6-yr) accepted & sec. 15 ack.
  • 2008-07-08 — Case file in ticrs
  • 2009-05-16 — Cancelled sec. 8 (10-yr)/expired section 9
  • 2009-05-16 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

ANDRONIC DEVICES LTD.
RICHMOND, B.C. CA
ANDRONIC DEVICES LTD.
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA CA
ANDRONIC DEVICES LTD.
VANCOUVER, BRITISH COLUMBIA CA

Correspondent

KLARQUIST, SPARKMAN, CAMPBELL, ET AL
ONE WORLD TRADE CTR
121 S W SALMON ST STE 1600
PORTLAND, OR 97204

Filing Details

Filing Date:
1985-06-26
Status Date:
2009-05-16
Category:
Medical Apparatus
Filing Year:
1985

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.