Trademark search for:

DUALFLEX

EXPIRED USPTO USPTO

USPTO

No active United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) registrations found, based on publicly available USPTO trademark records.

Trademark records may change over time. For the most up-to-date trademark status, domain availability, and social handle checks, run a live search.

Live search · Most up-to-date results

Also check across:

USPTO Filing History

Key events recorded for this trademark application

2004-04-27 — Application filed
2004-05-05 — Application filed
2004-11-22 — Approved for pub - principal register
2004-11-22 — Assigned to examiner
2004-11-29 — Assigned to lie
2004-12-03 — Law office publication review completed
2005-01-12 — Notice of publication
2005-02-01 — Published for opposition
2005-04-26 — Noa mailed - sou required from applicant
2005-10-17 — Teas statement of use received
2005-10-17 — Use amendment filed
2005-10-28 — Statement of use processing complete
2005-11-07 — Final disposition recorded
2005-11-07 — Final disposition recorded
2006-03-23 — Assigned to examiner
2006-04-05 — Paper received
2006-04-05 — Correspondence received in law office
2006-04-26 — Allowed principal register - sou accepted
2006-04-26 — Amendment from applicant entered
2006-05-05 — Assigned to lie
2006-05-10 — Law office registration review completed
2006-06-27 — Registered-principal register
2012-03-30 — Attorney/dom.rep.revoked and/or appointed
2012-03-30 — Teas revoke/app/change addr of atty/dom rep received
2013-02-01 — Cancelled sec. 8 (6-yr)
2013-02-01 — Final status recorded

Owner Information

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC.
MAPLE GROVE , MN

BOSTON SCIENTIFIC SCIMED, INC.
MAPLE GROVE , MN

SciMed Life Systems, Inc.
Maple Grove , MN

SciMed Life Systems, Inc.
Maple Grove , MN

Correspondent

Kristina M. Foudray SEAGER, TUFTE & WICKHEM LLC
1221 Nicollet Avenue
Suite 800
Minneapolis, MN 55403

Filing Details

Filing Date:
2004-04-27

Status Date:
2013-02-01

Category:
Medical Apparatus

Filing Year:
1990

Disclaimer: This page is informational only and does not constitute legal advice. Trademark availability depends on jurisdiction, usage, and legal interpretation.